Share:


Comprehension of creativity in the context of the correlation of Plato’s philosophy, theories of fractals and archetypes

    Anatoliy Stoletov   Affiliation

Abstract

The study examines the creative process using the logical and methodological analysis of Plato’s concepts. It presents the modern scientific research related directly or indirectly to his philosophical views (the structural analogy method, the theory of archetypes and fractals and many others). A number of modern studies and concepts, such as the theory of fractals, evolutionary epistemology, the concept of autopoiesis, and others, confirm Plato’s views on the structure of the world and creativity. For this reason, the authors define creativity as the activity of a rational and social subject to produce a qualitatively new thing based on universal patterns of the fractal and archetype nature in accordance with the ideal. This activity needs in creativeness which is the state of love as a creative force arising from social interaction as a desire to create and expand space for life, connecting space inside the subject of creativity and outside it, creating a resonance between the creative self and other persons.

Keyword : archetype, creative state, creativeness, creativity, eidos, fractal, idea, ideal, Plato

How to Cite
Stoletov, A. (2022). Comprehension of creativity in the context of the correlation of Plato’s philosophy, theories of fractals and archetypes. Creativity Studies, 15(1), 89–101. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2022.13428
Published in Issue
Jan 31, 2022
Abstract Views
525
PDF Downloads
523
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Asmis, E. (1999). Plato on poetic creativity. In R. Kraut (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Plato (pp. 338–364). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521430186.011

Brodsky, J. (1995). On grief and reason: Essays. Farrar, Straus & Giroux.

Burneko, G. (2014). It’s child’s play: Contemplative anthropocosmic creativity. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 70(8), 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2014.988049

Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter. Flamingo.

Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2016). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge University Press.

Carson, Sh. H. (2018). Creativity and psychopathology: A relationship of shared neurocognitive vulnerabilities. In R. E. Jung & O. Vartanian (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the neuroscience of creativity (pp. 136–157). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.009

Chavez, R. A., & Carmen Lara, del M. (2000). La creatividad y la psicopatologia. Salud Mental, 23(5), 1–9.

Cığır Dikyol, D. (2012). The effects of Mythos’ on Plato’s educational approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 55, 560–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.537

Colonna, J.‑F. (1995). Creativity and simplicity. The Visual Computer, 11, 447–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464334

Cordingley, A. (2013). Beckett’s philosophical imagination: Democritus versus Pythagoras and Plato in comment C’est/How It Is. Comparative Literature, 65(4), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1215/00104124-2376606

Costelloe, T. M. (2012). Imagination and internal sense: The sublime in Shaftesbury, Reid, Addison, and Reynolds. In T. M. Costelloe (Ed.), The Sublime: From antiquity to the present (pp. 50–63). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978920.006

Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.

Daniels‐McGhee, S., & Davis, G. A. (1994). The imagery‐creativity connection. Journal of Creative Behavior, 28(3), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1994.tb01189.x

Downing, R., & Taylor, R. (2014). The fractal clock: Using chaos to bridge the art-science divide. Non-linear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 18(1), 109–122.

Eliade, M. (2005). The myth of the eternal return. Princeton University Press.

Erovenko, V. A. (2015). Koncepcija fraktala Mandel’brota s matematicheskoj i filosofskoj tochek zrenija. Matematicheskie struktury i modelirovanie, 4(36), 29–39.

Gaut, B. (2007). Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001

Georgaki, A., & Tsolakis, Ch. (2011). Fractal based curves in musical creativity: A critical annotation. In Ch. H. Skiadas, I. Dimotikalis & Ch. Skiadas (Eds.), Chaos theory: Modeling, simulation and applications. Selected Papers from the 3rd Chaotic Modeling and Simulation International Conference (pp. 167–174). World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814350341_0019

George, L. (2015). Socrates on teaching: Looking back to move education forward. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3970–3974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1142

Gerofsky, S. (Ed.). (2018). Contemporary environmental and mathematics education modelling using new geometric approaches: Geometries of liberation. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72523-9

Grincevičienė, V., Valatka, V., Grincevičius, J., & Grincevičienė, Š. (2015). Ethical aspects of pharmacogenetics: A need for creativity. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(3), 230–238.

Grof, S. (1985). SUNY Series in transpersonal and humanistic psychology. Beyond the brain: Birth, death and transcendence in psychotherapy. R. D. Mann & J. B. Mann (Eds.). State University of New York Press.

Guenon, R. (2004a). Collected works of Rene Guenon. The esoterism of Dante. J. R. Wetmore (Series Ed.). Sophia Perennis.

Guenon, R. (2004b). Collected works of Rene Guenon. The reign of quantity and the signs of the times. J. R. Wetmore (Series Ed.). Sophia Perennis.

Hadamard, J. (1954). An essay on the psychology of invention in the mathematical field. Dover Publications, Inc.

Heisenberg, W. (2000). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science. Penguin Classics.

Ihsen, S., Isenhardt, I., & Steinhagen De Sanchez, U. (1998). Creativity, complexity and self‐similarity: The vision of the fractal university. European Journal of Engineering Education, 23(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/0304379980230103

Joseph, J. E. (2006). Plato’s Cratylus and its legacy. In K. Brown (Ed.-in-Chief). Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Vol. 1 (pp. 636–638). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/01344-4

Jung, C. G. (1991). The archetypes and the collective unconscious. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691229782-023

Kačerauskas, T. (2008). Kūnas gyvenamajame pasaulyje. Problemos, 73, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.15388/Problemos.2008.0.2017

Kačerauskas, T., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Creative ecology in academic environment. Filosofija. Sociologija, 26(3), 239–248.

Kant, I. (2008). Critique of pure reason. Penguin Classics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-10016-0

Karpov, A. (2015). The ancient Episteme of activity as ontological horizon of modern education development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 214, 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.720

Kaufman, A. B., Butt, A. E., Kaufman, J. C., & Colbert-White, E. N. (2011). Towards a neurobiology of creativity in nonhuman animals. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 125(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023147

Kodama, M. (2019). Business innovation through holistic leadership-developing organizational adaptability. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(4), 365–394. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2551

Kozinets, R. (2016). Flow my bits, the professor screened: Netnography, academic micro-celebrity, and personal branding. In M. Cabrera Mendez & N. Lloret Romero (Eds.), Digital tools for academic branding and self-promotion (pp. 53–66). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0917-2.ch004

Kraut, R. (Ed.). (1999). The Cambridge companion to Plato. Cambridge University Press.

Levick, D., & Kuhn, L. (2007). Fractality, organizational management, and creative change. World Futures: The Journal of New Paradigm Research, 63(3–4), 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604020601174885

Lorenz, K. (1966). On aggression. A Harvest Book.

Mandelbrot, B. B. (1977). Fractals: Form, chance and dimension. W. H. Freeman & Company.

Mandelbrot, B. B. (2007). Scalebound or scaling shapes: A useful distinction in the visual arts and in the natural sciences. Leonardo, 14, 45–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1574481

Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. W. H. Freeman & Company.

Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1992). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Shambhala Publications, Inc.

Nicolacopoulos, T., & Vassilacopoulos, G. (2017). Cave dwellers or labyrinth diggers? Castoriadis and Plato on philosophy and politics. Critical Horizons, 18(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2017.1293884

North Whitehead, A. (1978). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. Corrected edition. D. R. Griffin & D. W. Sherburne (Eds.). The Free Press.

North Whitehead, A. (1967). Science and the modern world. The Free Press.

Pang, T. Y., & Maslov, S. (2013). Universal distribution of component frequencies in biological and technological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 6235–6239. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217795110

Pauer, J. (2003). Je ešte možny spoločny svet? Alebo o jednote v mnohosti a o spoločnom zaklade v potencii. II. Časť: Komplexna domena potencie. Filozofia, 58(3), 188–198.

Pilipović, J. (2013). Ad sidera: Tree-Space symbolism in Plato’s Phaedrus and Vergil’s Eclogues. Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 53(2–3), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1556/AAnt.53.2013.2-3.6

Plato. (1989). Symposium. Hackett Publishing Company.

Plato. (2008a). The Republic (pp. 138–157). Digireads.com Publishing.

Plato. (2008b). Timaeus. Book Jungle.

Plotinus. (2017). The Enneads of Plotinus with philosophical commentaries. Ennead V.8: On Intelligible Beauty. J. M. Dillon & A. Smith (Eds.). Parmenides Publishing.

Poincare, H. (1910). Mathematical creation. The Monist, 20(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19102037

Popper, K. (1985). Evolutionary epistemology. In G. Tarozzi & A. van der Merwe (Eds.), Fundamental theories of physics: Vol. 10. Open questions in quantum physics (pp. 395–413). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5245-4_27

Popper, K. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400846672

Raye, J. (2014). Fractal organisation theory. Journal of Organisational Transformation and Social Change, 11(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1179/1477963313Z.00000000025

Scott, D. (2011). Plato: Poetry and creativity. In P. Destree & F.-G. Herrmann (Eds.). Mnemosyne, Supplementa: Vol. 328. Plato and the poets (pp. 131–154). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004201293.i-434.29

Shear, J. (1982). The universal structures and dynamics of creativity: Maharishi, Plato, Jung and various creative geniuses on the creative process. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16(3), 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1982.tb00331.x

Shim, S. H. (2008). A philosophical investigation of the role of teachers: A synthesis of Plato, Confucius, Buber, and Freire. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.09.014

Stoletov, A. (2016). Social creativity and phenomenon of success in postindustrial society. Creativity Studies, 9(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.3846/23450479.2016.1223765

Suzen, H. N., & Mamur, N. (2014). Reflection of “Philosophy” on art and philosophy of art. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1339

Talanov, V. M. (2013). Vozmozhen li universal’nyj metajazyk kul’tury? Yuzhno-Rossijskij gosudarstvenny’j politexnicheskij universitet im. M. I. Platova.

Talanov, V., & Talanov, M. (2017). Structural similarity of sign systems in culture and science. Acta Crystallographica, Section A 70(C1002). https://doi.org/10.1107/S2053273317085722

Taleb, N. N. (2010). The Black Swan: The impact of highly improbable. Random House Publishing Group.

Taliaferro, Ch., & Varie, M. (2018). The active and passive life of creativity: An essay in a platonic key. In B. Gaut & M. Kieran (Eds.), Creativity and philosophy (pp. 141–150). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351199797-9

Tanasić, N. (2016). Eiδoσ and Ποίησις in Plato’s Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy ARHE, 13(26), 79–97.

Tucan, D. (2013). The Quarrel between poetry and philosophy: Plato – A sceptical view on “Poetry”. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 71, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.023

Voutichtis, Ch., & Rehm, J. A. (2016). No place for urban art. Street Art and Urban Creativity, 2(2), 45–47.

Waal, de F. (2017). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? W. W. Norton & Company.

Waal, de F. (2014). The Bonobo and the Atheist: In search of humanism among the primates. W. W. Norton & Company.

Wang, T. J., & Huang, K. H. (2018). Pedagogy, philosophy, and the question of creativity. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379479

Weizsacker, von C. F. (1980). The unity of nature. Farrar Straus Giroux.

Wheeler, A. M. (1969). Creativity in Plato’s States. Educational Theory, 19(3), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1969.tb00389.x