Importance of criteria weights in BREEAM in-use and 3E building sustainability evaluation systems
Abstract
Combating climate change and reducing greenhouse gas emissions are among the European Union’s priorities today. Direct implementation of these priorities is sustainable buildings. This paper analyzes the energy supply of a health resort building with renewable energy sources in the context of the “BREEAM In-Use” sustainability assessment system. The criteria for the “BREEAM In-Use” scoring system are grouped according to the 3E criteria and recommendations are made for the weights of the 3E assessment system criteria. In accordance with the criteria grouping methodology in the article, in the context of 3E criteria, the maximum weight should reach the energy indicator (about 50%), the second most important one is the ecological criterion, and about 16% should only meet the economic criterion.
Article in Lithuanian.
Rodiklių svorių svarba BREEAM ir 3E pastatų darnumo vertinimo sistemose
Santrauka
Vieni iš šiandienių Europos Sąjungos prioritetų – kova su klimato kaita ir šiltnamio efektą sukeliančių išmetamų dujų kiekio mažinimas. Tiesioginis šių prioritetų įgyvendinimas – tai darnūs pastatai. Šiame darbe analizuojamas gydyklos pastato energijos aprūpinimas diegiant atsinaujinančius energijos išteklius BREEAM In-Use darnumo vertinimo sistemos kontekste. BREEAM In-Use vertinimo sistemos kriterijai grupuojami 3E kriterijų principu ir parengiamos rekomendacijos 3E vertinimo sistemos kriterijų svoriams. Pagal straipsnyje pateiktą kriterijų grupavimo metodiką 3E kriterijų kontekste didžiausias svoris turėtų atitekti energiniam rodikliui (apie 50 %), antras pagal svarbumą – ekologinis kriterijus ir tik apie 16 % turėtų atitekti ekonominiam kriterijui.
Reikšminiai žodžiai: energinis vertinimas, aplinkosauginis vertinimas, pastatas, BREEAM, 3E, darnumas.
Keyword : energinis vertinimas, aplinkosauginis vertinimas, pastatas, BREEAM, 3E, darnumas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Freitas, I. A. S., & Zhang, X. (2018). Green building rating systems in Swedish market − a comparative analysis between LEED, BREEAM SE, GreenBuilding and Miljöbyggnad. Energy Procedia, 153, 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.066
Gadišauskaitė, R. ir Mikučionienė, R. (2019). The 22th Conference for Junior Researchers “Science − Future of Lithuania” Building Energetics (pp. 15-19), Vilnius, Lithuania.
Heincke, C., & Olsson, O. (2012). Simply GREEN. Kvanum: Swegon Air Academy.
Lietuvos žaliųjų pastatų taryba. (2019). Lietuvos pastatų tvarumo vertinimo sistema. Retrieved from https://www.lzpt.lt/tvarumo-vertinimas/#zemelapis
Mikučionienė, R., Martinaitis, V. ir Keras, E. (2014). Evaluation of energy efficiency measures sustainability by decision tree method. Energy and Buildings, 76, 64-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.048
Miller, N., Spivey, J., & Florance, A. (2008). Does green pay off? Journal of Real Estate Portfolio Management, 14(4), 385-400. Retrieved from http://ares.metapress.com/content/M5G-300025P233U24
Olsson, D. (2013, May). Wide variation in how parameters are regarded in environmental certification systems. REHVA Journal, 92-93.
Suzer, O. (2019). Analyzing the compliance and correlation of LEED and BREEAM by conducting a criteria-based comparative analysis and evaluating dual-certified projects. Building and Environment, 147, 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.001
Turk, S., Quintana, S. N. S. A., & Zhang, X. (2018). Life-cycle analysis as an indicator for impact assessment in sustainable building certification systems: the case of Swedish building market. Energy Procedia, 153, 414-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.10.025