Exploring the approaches towards support of academic entrepreneurship: evidence from an emerging market
Abstract
Over the past three decades, an exponentially growing body on elements and actors of the concept of an entrepreneurial university has emerged. Compared to its western European counterparts, however, the idea of the third role of the university has only recently been implemented in Central and Eastern European countries, and thus both research and entrepreneurial practice grapple with empirical results. In this paper, we attempt to fill this gap while adopting a case study approach to examine the issue of what resources a prominent technical university operating in the emerging market of the Czech Republic transfers to academic ventures to utilise and commercialise university research results. Within a survey, nine academic founders and two university representatives were interviewed to assess the role of university resources in facilitating academic entrepreneurship. Our research results suggest that creating infrastructure to foster the third role of universities in an emerging market is a complex and long-term issue. Formal institutions embedded in the intra-university organisational structure, such as knowledge transfer offices and entrepreneurial centres, need to be equipped with sufficient resources and competences. Skilled people with their own network of contacts to intra-university departments and external environment represented by regional incubators, venture capital providers, business angel associations, and experienced entrepreneurs should be involved in the process of creating and increasing capacity. Furthermore, the upcoming agenda should undoubtedly acknowledge the significant role of entrepreneurship education with a focus on talent recognition and entrepreneurship training to impact the entrepreneurial intentions of researchers and students. Overall, we also conclude that the motivation of academics to commercialise their inventions could be positively affected by the applied concepts of assessing their performance. Finally, this study shows that measures at all management levels have to be adopted to create a vital organisational culture that will be in alignment with the vision of entrepreneurial university. The novelty of this paper is twofold. First, the study provides a useful methodological concept of data collection as the multi-level approach was applied for studying the phenomenon of entrepreneurial university. Furthermore, the research findings have valuable implications for university authorities, as well as national and local policy makers, in creating growth programmes and supporting the entrepreneurial mindset.
Keyword : knowledge economy, academic entrepreneurship, university start-up, university spin-off, knowledge transfer, technology transfer, emerging market, innovation, development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Beckman, G. D., & Cherwitz, R. A. (2009). Intellectual entrepreneurship: An authentic foundation for higher education reform. Planning for Higher Education, 37(4), Article 27.
Bigos, K., & Milka, P. (2024). Power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and students’ entrepreneurial intentions. International Entrepreneurship Review, 10(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2024.1002.08
Bonaccorsi, A., Blasi, B., Nappi, C. A., & Romagnosi, S. (2022). Quality of research as source and signal: Revisiting the valorization process beyond substitution vs complementarity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 47(2), 407–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09860-7
Brantnell, A., & Baraldi, E. (2022). Understanding the roles and involvement of technology transfer offices in the commercialization of university research. Technovation, 115, Article 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102525
Burg, E. van, Romme, A. G. L., Gilsing, V. A., & Reymaen, I. M. M. J. (2008). Creating university spin-offs: A science-based design perspective. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00291.x
Cai, Y., & Ahmad, I. (2023). From entrepreneurial university to a sustainable entrepreneurial university an: Conceptualization and evidence in the contexts of European university reforms. Higher Education Policy, 36, 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41307-021-00243-z
Civera, A., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2020). Engagement of academics in university technology transfer: Opportunity and necessity academic entrepreneurship. European Economic Review, 123, Article 103376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103376
Colombo, M. G., & Piva, E. (2008). Strengths and weaknesses of academic startups: A conceptual model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55(1), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912807
Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
De Cleyn, S. H., & Braet, J. (2010). The evolution of spin-off ventures: An integrated model. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 7(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877010001829
Diaz Tautiva, J. A., Salvaj Carrera, E., Vásquez-Lavín, F., & Ponce Oliva, R. D. (2023). Understanding the role of institutions and economic context on entrepreneurial value creation choice. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(2), 405–447. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.011
Doanh Duong, C. (2024). ChatGPT adoption and digital entrepreneurial intentions: An empirical research based on the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 12(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2024.120208
Duong, C. D. (2023). A moderated mediation model of perceived barriers, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, intentions, and behaviors: A social cognitive career theory perspective. Oeconomia Copernicana, 14(1), 355–388. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2023.010
Dyke, J. G., & Monbiot, G. (2024). What is the role of universities at a time of climate and ecological crisis?. Geo: Geography and Environment, 11(2), Article e00146. https://doi.org/10.1002/geo2.146
Dzikowski, P. (2022). Product and process innovation patterns in Polish low and high technology systems. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 747–773. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.026
Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). What is the Eisenhardt Method, really? Strategic Organization, 19(1), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020982866
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888
Etzkowitz, H. (2017). Innovation lodestar: The entrepreneurial university in a stellar knowledge firmament. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 123, 122–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.04.026
Gehman, J., Glaser, V. L., Eisenhardt, K. M., Gioia, D., Langley, A., & Corley, K. G. (2018). Finding theory–method fit: A comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(3), 284–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617706029
Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2009). On interviewing good and bad experts. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing experts (pp. 117–137). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244276_6
Gübeli, M. H., & Doloreux, D. (2005). An empirical study of university spin off development. European Journal of Innovation Management, 8(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060510610153
Hassan, Z., Lashari, M. K., & Basit, A. (2021). Cultivating entrepreneurial culture among students in Malaysia. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090108
Hrivnák, M., Chreneková, M., & Jarábková, J. (2023). Evolutionary models of academic spin-offs establishment – comparison of Catalonia and South-Moravian region. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 21(4), 864–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2022.2083991
Ismail, K., Mason, C., & Cooper, S. (2010). University spin-off formations: How decision making process has been made?. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 1(2).
Kuczewska, J., & Tomaszewski, T. (2022). Exploring potential drivers of innovation-related activities in Poland: Evidence from Polish business clusters. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 17(3), 775–801. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.027
Lattu, A., & Cai, Y. (2020). Tensions in the sustainability of higher education – The case of Finnish universities. Sustainability, 12(5), Article 1941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051941
Lee, Y., & Lee, Y.-H. (2020). University start-ups: The relationship between faculty start-ups and student start-ups. Sustainability, 12(21), Article 9015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219015
Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and university’ spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022220216972
Meseri, O., & Maital, S. (2001). A survey analysis of university-technology transfer in Israel: Evaluation of projects and determinants of success. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1–2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007844530539
Neves, M., & Franco, M. (2018). Academic spin‐off creation: Barriers and how to overcome them. R & D Management, 48(5), 505–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12231
Nowiński, W., Haddoud, M. Y., Lančarič, D., Egerová, D., & Czeglédi, C. (2019). The impact of entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy and gender on entrepreneurial intentions of university students in the Visegrad countries. Studies in Higher Education (Dorchester-on-Thames), 44(2), 361–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1365359
Odei, M. A., & Novak, P. (2023). Determinants of universities’ spin-off creations. Economic research - Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 1279–1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2086148
Ortín-Ángel, P., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2010). Why do university spin-offs attract more venture capitalists?. Venture Capital, 12(4), 285–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691066.2010.486166
Parmentola, A., & Ferretti, M. (2018). Stages and trigger factors in the development of academic spin-offs: An explorative study in Southern Italy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(3), 478–500. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2017-0159
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. SAGE Publications, inc.
Pazos, D. R., López, S. F., González, L. O., & Sandiás, A. R. (2012). A resource-based view of university spin-off activity: New evidence from the Spanish case/Una aplicación de la teoría de los recursos a la creación de spin-offs universitarias. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 21(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redee.2012.05.006
Pedro, E., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2019). The intellectual capital of higher education institutions: Operationalizing measurement through a strategic prospective lens. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 20(3), 355–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-07-2018-0117
Rasmussen, E., & Wright, M. (2015). How can universities facilitate academic spin-offs? An entrepreneurial competency perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(5), 782–799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9386-3
Sabary, G. S., & Ključnikov, A. (2023). Barriers to immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis of the Asian immigrant entrepreneurs in Germany employing the DEMATEL approach. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(2), 491–522. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.015
Sabary, G. S., Durda, L., Asad, A. I., & Ključnikov, A. (2023). Key motivational factors behind Asian immigrant entrepreneurship: A causal relationship analysis employing the DEMATEL approach for Germany. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(1), 287–318. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2023.009
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00196-2
Skalická, M., Zinecker, M., Balcerzak, A. P., & Pietrzak, M. (2023). Business angels and early stage decision making criteria: Empirical evidence from an emerging market. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2063920
Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00006-8
Świadek, A., Dzikowski, P., Gorączkowska , J., & Tomaszewski, M. (2022). The National Innovation System in a catching-up country: Empirical evidence based on micro data of a Triple Helix in Poland. Oeconomia Copernicana, 13(2), 511–540. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.016
van Stijn, N., van Rijnsoever, F. J., & van Veelen, M. (2018). Exploring the motives and practices of university–start-up interaction: Evidence from Route 128. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 674–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9625-5
Wach, K., & Bilan, S. (2023). Creativity of students in favour of their entrepreneurial intentions: Empirical evidence from Poland. Creativity Studies, 16(1), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2023.15028
Wakkee, I., Van der Sijde, P., Vaupell, C., & Ghuman, K. (2019). The university‘s role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 5). Sage.
Yin, R. K. (1992). The case study method as a tool for doing evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/001139292040001009