Research on rail and maritime transport interoperability in the area of information systems: the case of Lithuania
Abstract
With the acceleration of globalization processes and increased international cooperation, freight transport routes are expanding, which requires new solutions for the most efficient use of various modes of transport. One of the most important factors that may improve the efficiency of the interoperability of different transport modes is information exchange allowing to plan transport flows in advance, exploiting benefits of the maritime and rail transport and minimizing its disadvantages. Precise information allows to find the most efficient mode of transport for the freight transportation chain. Precise information is necessary for effective management of information flows to ensure interoperability between the transport modes. This article analyses the specificity of railway and maritime transport modes, hence research questionnaire of Lithuanian transport companies is performed to present the results to show the most significant elements of railway and maritime transport interoperability. The completed expert evaluation enabled to prioritize the sequence of elements to ensure the efficient interoperability between rail and maritime transport.
Keyword : railway transport, maritime transport, interoperability, information systems, efficiency
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Baublys, A. Transporto rūšių sąveika. 2007. Vilnius: Technika. 282 p. https://doi.org/10.3846/1345-M (in Lithuanian).
Bozarth, C. B.; Handfield, R. B. 2012. Introduction to Operations and Supply Chain Management. Pearson. 504 p.
Blümel, E.; Babot, J.; Novitsky, L. 2003. Applications of Simulation and IT Solution in the Baltic Port Areas of the Associated Candidate Countries. Riga: JUMI Ltd. 317 p.
Bruinsma, F.; Gorter, C.; Nijkamp, P. 2000. Multimodal infrastructure, transport networks and the international relocation of firms, Transportation Planning and Technology 23(3): 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060008717652
Buvik, A. 2002. Hybrid governance and governance performance in industrial purchasing relationships, Scandinavian Journal of Management 18(4): 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(01)00030-6
Caris, A.; Janssens, G. K.; Macharis, C. 2009. Modelling complex intermodal freight flows, in M. A. Aziz-Alaoui, C. Bertelle C. (Eds.). From System Complexity to Emergent Properties, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02199-2_14
Chan, H. K.; Chan, F. T. S. 2009. Effect of information sharing in supply chains with flexibility, International Journal of Production Research 47(1): 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540600767764
Chandra, C.; Grabis, J.; Tumanyan, A. 2007. Problem taxonomy: a step towards effective information sharing in supply chain management, International Journal of Production Research 45(11): 2507–2544. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540601020486
Christopher, M. 2016. Logistics and Supply Chain Management. FT Press. 328 p.
Chowdhury, M. A.; Sadek, A. 2003. Fundamentals of Intelligent Transportation Systems Planning. Artech House. 210 p.
Delen, D.; Benjamin, P. C. 2003. Towards a truly integrated enterprise modeling and analysis environment, Computers in Industry 51(3): 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00063-0
Fawcett, S. E.; Magnan, G. M. 2001. Achieving World-Class Supply Chain Alignment: Benefits, Barriers, and Bridges. Center for Advanced Purchasing Studies, Arizona State University Research Park, AZ, US. 158 p.
Filimanavičienė, A. 2014. Freight transportation by rail, sea and road transport: interplays, advantages, possibilities, Transporter Railways 1(23). Available from Internet: http://www.zurnalastransportas.lt/?p=5770&lang=en
Homenko, A. P.; Kashtanov, J. B. 2010. Rol’ zheleznodorozhnogo transporta v globalizacii mezhdunarodnyh transportnyh koridorov, Vostochnaja Analitika 1: 118–128. (in Russian).
Gilbert, R. 2009. Grid-connected systems for sustainable transport in developing countries, International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 3(2): 110–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568310701824067
Ginters, E.; Bruzzone, A.; Gutmanis, A.; Rapp, B.; Verbraeck, A.; Neumann, G.; Blümel, E.; Capasso, S.; Merkuryev, Y.; Sarmulis, I.; Vucans, J.; Baerug. R. 2002. LOGIS project – network for knowledge consolidation and training in logistics information systems, in TransBaltica 2002: VII International Conference, 14–15 June 2002, Riga, Latvia, 129–135.
Janic, M. 2001. Integrated transport systems in the European Union: an overview of some recent developments, Transport Reviews 21(4): 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640110042147
Jarašūnienė, A. 2007. Research into intelligent transport systems (ITS) technologies and efficiency, Transport 22(2): 61–67. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2007.9638100
Jarašūnienė, A.; Greičiūnė, L.; Šakalys, A. 2012. Research of competitive environment of Klaipėda Seaport comparing to other seaports in the eastern Baltic Sea region, Transport 27(1): 5–13. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2012.662911
Large, R. O. 2005. External communication behaviour of purchasers – effects on supplier management performance, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Chain Management 11(1): 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2005.06.001
Leal, E.; Pérez, G. 2012. Port-Rail Integration: Challenges and Opportunities for Latin America, FAL Bulletin 310(7): 1–10.
Li, L. 2002. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition, Management Science 48(9): 1196–1212. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.9.1196.177
Marma, A.; Eidukas, D.; Valinevičius, A.; Žilys, M. 2004. Intelektualiosios transporto valdymo sistemos, Elektronika ir elektrotechnika 56(7): 49–54.
Martínez-Zarzoso, I.; Nowak-Lehmann, F. D. 2007. Is distance a good proxy for transport costs? The case of competing transport modes, The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development: an International and Comparative Review 16(3): 411–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190701527186
McGee, K. 2004. Give me that real-time information, Harvard Business Review 82(4). Available from Internet: https://hbr.org/2004/04/give-me-that-real-time-information
Mortimer, P.; Ribeiro, J.; Kula, P.; Balik, Ş.; Mistodie, O.-A. 2014. Design of integrated and co-ordinated multimodal transport systems – North Sea – Mediterranean corridor, Transport Problems 9: 71–88.
Müller, M.; Gaudig, S. 2011. An empirical investigation of antecedents to information exchange in supply chains, International Journal of Production Research 49(6): 1531–1555. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540903567317
Novitsky, L.; Ragozin, V.; Victorova, E. 2000. Integrated information system design based on the modeling of insurance business process, in ESM 2000: European Simulation and Modelling Conference, 23–26 May 2000, Ghent, Belgium, 398–400.
Paixão Casaca, A. C.; Marlow, P. B. 2009. Logistics strategies for short sea shipping operating as part of multimodal transport chains, Maritime Policy & Management: the Flagship Journal of International Shipping and Port Research 36(1): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802652254
Palšaitis, R. 2011. Tarptautinio verslo transportinis aptarnavimas. Vilnius: Technika. 289 p. https://doi.org/10.3846/1193-S (in Lithuanian).
Peng, Z.-R.; Yang, F.; Perch, S. 2011. Sustainable transportation, in M. Kutz (Ed.). Handbook of Transportation Engineering, Volume I: Systems and Operations, 9.1–9.22.
Riad, M.; Ming, Z. 2014. Challenges and opportunities in applying high-fidelity travel demand model for improved network-wide traffic estimation: a review and discussion, The Open Transportation Journal 8: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447801408010001
Saakian, I.; Savchuk, V. 2013. Railway transportation: problems and solutions, Problems of Economic Transition 56(3): 73–95. https://doi.org/10.2753/PET1061-1991560308
Sinkevičius, G. 2017. Geležinkelių transporto plėtros internacionalizacijos procesų valdymas. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Technika. 188 p. (in Lithuanian).
Sinkevičius, G.; Dailydka, S. 2014. Railway transport in the conditions of globalisation, in 8th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2014”, 15–16 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, 442–451. https://doi.org/10.3846/bm.2014.053
Sinkevičius, G.; Jarašūnienė, A. 2015. The development of railway transport in the context of international intermodal transportation, logistics and transport corridors, in Transport Means 2015: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference, 22–23 October 2015, Kaunas, Lithuania, 478–484.
Sokolov, A. A.; Solov’jov, A. A. 2015. Osnovy vzaimodejstvija zheleznodorozhnogo i vodnogo (morskogo) transporta (na primere Murmanskogo transportnogo uzla), Vestnik MGTU 18(1): 48–52. (in Russian).
Van de Velde, D.; Nash, C.; Smith, A.; Mizutani, F.; Uranishi, S.; Lijesen, M.; Zschoche, F. 2012a. EVES–Rail: Economic Effects of Vertical Separation in the Railway Sector: Full Technical Report. 188 p. Available from Internet: http://www.cer.be/sites/default/files/publication/Full-Report.pdf
Van de Velde, D.; Nash, C.; Smith, A.; Mizutani, F.; Uranishi, S.; Lijesen, M.; Zschoche, F. 2012b. EVES–Rail: Economic Effects of Vertical Separation in the Railway Sector: Summary Report. 46 p. Available from Internet: http://www.cer.be/sites/default/files/publication/EVES-Rail_-_Final__v6.4.3__SUMMARY.pdf
Vogt, J. J.; Pienaar, W. J.; De Wit, P. W. C. 2006. Business Logistics Management: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. 392 p.
Yao-Rong, C.; Ming, S.; Yue, C. 2009. The analysis and calculation of the cost of intermodal freight transport, in 2009 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation, 10–11 October 2011, Changsha, Hunan, China, 451–454. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICTA.2009.824