Share:


Evaluation of the pre-detective signal priority for bus rapid transit: coordinating the primary and secondary intersections

    Min Yang Affiliation
    ; Gang Sun Affiliation
    ; Wei Wang Affiliation
    ; Xin Sun Affiliation
    ; Jian Ding Affiliation
    ; Jing Han Affiliation

Abstract

Since the traditional transit priority strategy can only adjust signal timing in a limited range and is not suitable for all kinds of signal timing designs, it cannot provide enough priority for Bus Rapid Transit (BRT). In addition, traditional transit priority strategy has caused serious interferences with other traffic. This study proposes a pre-detective signal priority strategy for BRT with coordination between primary and secondary intersections. By pre-detecting, the time buses arrive at the primary intersection, the signal timing of both the primary and secondary intersections, along with the offsets, are adjusted simultaneously, based on the common length and the green ratio of each phase. In this method, the signal cycle constraints are clarified, and the bus control coordination between intersections has been taken into consideration. In this paper, one direction traffic is taken as a study example to testify the effectiveness of this method. The study uses the data collected from Changzhou, China, and a microscopic traffic simulation software PTV VISSIM with four simulation scenarios defined: no signal priority, traditional signal priority, pre-detective signal priority and pre-detective signal priority with coordination. This paper selects a set of indicators to evaluate the traffic operation for both public transit and private traffic. Results show that pre-detective signal priority with coordination is the most effective, with the total bus intersection delay decreases by 67.4% and the bus headway adherence declines by approximately 40% at all the primary and secondary stations of BRT line 1. Moreover, the negative effects that could happen with providing signal priority for BRT, such as increasing the delay and length of queue of private traffic at the intersections, are significantly reduced.


First published online 28 January 2015

Keyword : bus rapid transit, pre-detective signal priority, coordinated control, microscopic simulation, strategy

How to Cite
Yang, M., Sun, G., Wang, W., Sun, X., Ding, J., & Han, J. (2018). Evaluation of the pre-detective signal priority for bus rapid transit: coordinating the primary and secondary intersections. Transport, 33(1), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.3846/16484142.2015.1004556
Published in Issue
Jan 26, 2018
Abstract Views
923
PDF Downloads
726
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Berkhout, A.; Righolt, J. 2011. Chinese Driving Behavior in Nanjing Calibrating VISSIM Parameters. Project Nanjing 2009.

Chen, G. Q. 2005. Signal priority to BRT vehicles at a signalized intersection according to their headways, Computer and Communications 23(3): 11–15. (in Chinese). http://dx.doi.org/10.3963/j.issn.1674-4861.2005.03.004

Chen, W.; Chen, Z. 2009. Service reliability analysis of high frequency transit using stochastic simulation, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology 9(5): 130–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1570-6672(08)60083-5

Eichler, M.; Daganzo, C. F. 2006. Bus lanes with intermittent priority: strategy formulae and an evaluation, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 40(9): 731–744. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.10.001

Ekeila, W.; Sayed, T.; El Esawey, M. 2009. Development of dynamic transit signal priority strategy, Transportation Research Record 2111: 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2111-01

Head, K. L. 2006. Improved Traffic Signal Priority for Transit. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report A-16. Transportation Research Board (TRB).

Koehler, L. A.; Kraus, W. 2010. Simultaneous control of traffic lights and bus departure for priority operation, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18(3): 288–298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2009.01.007

Langdon, S. M. 2002. Simulation of Houston light rail transit predictive priority operation, ITE Journal 72(11): 28–32.

Liu, H. C.; Lin, W.-H.; Tan, C.-W. 2007. Operational strategy for advanced vehicle location system–based transit signal priority, Journal of Transportation Engineering 133(9): 513–522. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2007)133:9(513)

Toledo, T.; Cats, O.; Burghout, W.; Koutsopoulos, H. N. 2010. Mesoscopic simulation for transit operations, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18(6): 896–908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2010.02.008

TRB. 2003. Bus Rapid Transit, Volume 2: Implementation Guidelines. Transit Cooperative Research Program (TCRP) Report 90. Transportation Research Board (TRB). 233 p. Available from Internet: http://www.tcrponline.org/PDFDocuments/TCRP_RPT_90v2.pdf

Vasudevan, M. 2005. Robust Optimization Model for Bus Priority under Arterial Progression: PhD Dissertation. University of Maryland, US. 174 p.

Wadjas, Y.; Furth, P. G. 2003. Transit signal priority along arterials using advanced detection, Transportation Research Record 1856: 220–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/1856-24

Wang, T. T.; Zhang, R. H.; Zhu, X. Y.; Wu, X. G.; Zhang, R. F. 2010. Bus rapid transit in Jinan, China – applying flexibility to transit system, in TRB 89th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, 10–14 January 2010, Washington, DC, 1–14.

Wu, G. Y.; Zhang, L. P.; Zhang, W.-B.; Tomizuka, M. 2012. Signal optimization at urban highway rail grade crossings using an online adaptive priority strategy, Journal of Transportation Engineering 138(4): 479–484. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000344

Xu, H. F.; Zheng, M. M. 2009. Impact of phase scheme on development and performance of a logic rule-based bus rapid transit signal priority, Journal of Transportation Engineering 135(12): 953–965. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000075

Yagar, S. 1993. Efficient transit priority at intersections, Transportation Research Record 1390: 10–15.